Provide superb outpatient care for your patients with HFrEF. Identify underlying causes of heart failure and titrate medications with ease. Dr Michelle Kittleson @MKittlesonMD (Cedars Sinai) breaks down the nuances of treating this common cardiac condition.
Claim CME for this episode at curbsiders.vcuhealth.org!
Patreon | Episodes | Subscribe | Spotify | YouTube | Newsletter | Contact | Swag! | CME


So your patient has an ejection fraction < 40%? The first question you should ask yourself when someone presents with a newly diagnosed cardiomyopathy is, what is the cause? Start with common causes and let your history and physical guide you to less common causes. In the developed world, the most likely cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is ischemic heart disease (Yuseuf et al 2023), and this etiology should be evaluated using risk stratification (lipids and HbA1C) and an appropriate ischemic study (stress test, coronary CT, or left heart catheterization) based on pretest probability and institutional availability. Additional investigation should include a thorough history evaluating the possibility of rheumatologic disease (Prasad et al 2015), substance use (think cocaine, alcohol, methamphetamines), and family history suggesting a genetic component. Your work up can be rounded out with an assessment for tachycardia/arrhythmia (ECG/loop recorder), TSH, serum ferritin, and HIV serologies. Just to be complete, don’t forget zebras like acromegaly can also cause heart failure (Colao et al 2019).
Kittleson Rule: Don’t check a test that won’t change your management.
A B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has limited utility outside of the initial diagnosis of heart failure. A physical exam showing elevated JVP and edema combined with a patient history of orthopnea and dyspnea on exertion is going to tell you if the patient is congested. Diuresis should be titrated to symptoms and physical exam not BNP. However, extremely high BNP (> 5000 ng/L) has prognostic value; a BNP this high carries with it a ~50% 3 month mortality (Zhang et al 2015).
There are no hard and fast rules for the order to initiate these medications. However, all four medications should be at target doses within six weeks of hospital discharge; this results in an absolute risk reduction for heart failure readmission or death of 8 percent in just six months (STRONG-HF). Dr. Kittleson favors rapid sequence initiation, and she reminds us that it’s important to remember which medicines make patients feel better. She typically starts with the ANRI, followed by MRA, then the SGLT2i, and then once a patient is optimized and decongested she adds the beta blocker. Dr. Kittleson starts with metoprolol succinate 12.5 mg and spironolactone 25 mg, checking labs every week when titrating. After a patient has achieved a stable dose, check labs every 3 months. Have a reason why if a patient is not on one medication from each of the four pillars. It can be useful to search the EMR to see if a medication was previously discontinued and why it was discontinued. Intolerance of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is a poor prognostic indicator, but many patients simply are not started on or reach target doses of appropriate therapy (Kocabase et al 2023).
Optimizing heart failure medication is a patient-centered process that should consider the amount of blood pressure room and money that each patient has to “spend.” Due to its survival benefit, Dr. Kittleson recommends reaching for the ARNI as the first medication when budgeting blood pressure. Metoprolol succinate can be chosen over carvedilol, because it is once a day and does not have alpha blocking properties, sparing a majority of the blood pressure effect. Dr. Kittleson recommends slipping once a day medications in at bedtime; a side effect of metoprolol is fatigue, so they might as well take it at night and be tired before going to bed. Furthermore, she discourages patients from checking their blood pressure if they feel well; if they can go about their day without almost fainting when they stand up, the number doesn’t matter.
Cost is often an issue with getting patients on sacubitril-valsartan and an SGLT2i. Dr. Kittleson recommends having a frank conversation with your patients to be sure that they can comfortably afford their medication. If the ARNI and SGLT2i are too expensive, she recommends using a generic ACEi which is incrementally worse than the ARNI and then spend the savings on a SGLT2i. While treating hypertension, you can use the better-tolerated ARB over the ACEi, but for HFrEF ACEi are preferred to ARBs (ELITE II TRIAL and CONSENSUS TRIAL). Only reach for an ARB if the patient has a history of angioedema.
In addition to the four pillars of HRrEF treatments, there are a few additional medications that can be used in rare circumstances. Hydralazine/isosorbide (A-HeFT), ivabradine (SHIFT), and vericiguat (VICTORIA) all have narrow indications in specific patient populations.
Beware of indication creep, hydralazine/isosorbide is an inferior treatment than ACEis and should only be used in specific scenarios (V-HeFT II). The A-HeFT trial studied self-described Black Americans who had HFrEF. At the time of the trial (2004), the patients were already on optimal meds per their physician–90% of trial participants were on ACEi and 70% were on beta blocker therapy–and the starting blood pressure of the trial was 120 mmHg systolic. Hydralazine/isosorbide should be reserved for patients who have additional blood pressure room after already being maxed out on GDMT.
Ivabradine inhibits the “funny” current and reduces HR without reducing cardiac contractility. Ivabradine is indicated in patients with an EF <35%, who are consistently in sinus rhythm, and have a HR > 70 beats/min despite maximum tolerated beta blocker (SHIFT).
Vericiguat, an oral guanylyl cyclase stimulator, is used for high risk patients with worsening symptoms already on GDMT (VICTORIA). These patients are very sick. If a patient is being considered for vericiguat, this medication should be a piece of a conversation that includes discussion of advanced therapies and palliative care.
Check an echo 3-6 months after optimization on GDMT. In observational cohorts, many patients can achieve HF with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) (from ≤35% to > 50%) after treatment with GDMT (Veltmann et al 2024). N.B., it’s HF with improved ejection fraction NOT HF with recovered EF; withdrawing GDMT on patients with HFimpEF results in worse outcomes (TRED-HF).
Kittleson Pet Peeve (a direct application of the Kittleson Rule noted above): checking an echo on a patient with known HF who is decompensated.
Only consider ICD, CRT, or mitral valve repair after GDMT is optimized. ICD implantation is indicated for primary prevention in patients with NYHA class II-III symptoms and LVEF <35% or NYHA class I with LVEF <30% (Butler et al 2022). CRT-D is indicated in patients with LVEF < 30%, and an intrinsic QRS duration > 120 msec (or paced QRS > 200 msec) (RAFT 14 year f/u and RAFT). Mitral regurgitation can either be primary, the valve’s fault, or secondary, the ventricle’s fault. MITRA-FR and COAPT are two studies with seemingly conflicting results looking at mitral valve repair in HFrEF. MITRA-FR studied patients with severe MR without attention to LV size and current medical therapy; this study did not show benefit. However, COAPT looked at a much more curated cohort of patients that considered LV shape and existing optimization of GDMT; with careful patient selection, COAPT showed benefits of lower HF hospitalization, lower mortality, and higher quality of life.
Patients should see a cardiologist if their clinical status changes. A useful mnemonic for when to refer for advanced therapies is I NEED HELP; I = IV inotropes, N = NYHA IIIB/IV or persistently elevated natriuretic peptides, E = End organ dysfunction, E = Ejection fraction < 20%, D = Defibrillator shocks, H = Hospitalizations > 1, E = Edema despite escalating diuretic agents, L = Low blood pressure and high heart rate, P = Progressive intolerance of GDMT (Baumwol 2017)
Mastering the Art of Patient Care
Listeners will learn the ins-and-outs of outpatient HFrEF management.
After listening to this episode listeners will…
Dr. Kittleson reports no relevant financial disclosures. The Curbsiders report no relevant financial disclosures.
Gorth DJ, Kittleson MM, Williams PN, Watto MF. “#458 Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction”. The Curbsiders Internal Medicine Podcast. thecurbsiders.com/category/curbsiders-podcast October 21, 2024.
You can try Freed for free right now by going to freed.ai. And listeners of Curbsiders can use code CURB50 for $50 off their first month.
Right now, Whisker is offering $75 off Litter-Robot bundles. AND, as a special offer to listeners, you can get an additional $50 off when you go to stopscooping.com/CURB.
Ready to take control of your job search? Visit beginlyhealth.com/curbsiders to get started
Writer and Producer: Deborah Gorth MD, PhD
Infographic and Cover Art: Zoya Surani
Hosts: Matthew Watto MD, FACP; Paul Williams MD, FACP
Reviewer: Emi Okamoto MD
Showrunners: Matthew Watto MD, FACP; Paul Williams MD, FACP
Technical Production: PodPaste
Guest: Michelle Kittleson MD, PhD
The Curbsiders are partnering with VCU Health Continuing Education to offer continuing education credits for physicians and other healthcare professionals. Visit curbsiders.vcuhealth.org and search for this episode to claim credit.
Got feedback? Suggest a Curbsiders topic. Recommend a guest. Tell us what you think.
We love hearing from you.

Yes, you can now join our exclusive community of core faculty at Kashlak Memorial Hospital along with all the perks:
Notice
We and selected third parties use cookies or similar technologies for technical purposes and, with your consent, for other purposes as specified in the cookie policy. Denying consent may make related features unavailable.
Close this notice to consent.
Comments
If a patient comes in with acute HFrEF secondary to an acute coronary syndrome, do they benefit from the usual relatively up titration of GDMT and indefinite therapy or can we revascularize, anti-platelets, B-blocker, risk factor optimization and see how the LV EF (hopefully) improves over a few weeks? I know there is a fair amount of overlap between HFrEF GDMT and post-ACS care. One minor thing to consider as an addition to the podcast is that HFrEF without ischemia, etc is not an indication for anti-platelet therapy. I enjoy the show. Keep up the great work.
Thank you for the show and great guests you always have, really enjoyed the episodes. I see in the show notes to switch from ACEi to ARBs in case of angioedema! That’s only possible in case of dry cough, but not angioedema. Keep up the great work